AI has democratised advanced fraud tactics. Deepfake scams bypass biometric checks in real-time, while AI-driven fraud rings spin up thousands of fake storefronts then vanish before regulators can even blink. Over 80% of modern financial fraud now involves tactics designed to evade traditional detection.
Financial crime has become faster, smarter and harder to trace. At the same time, regulatory expectations are shifting. With mandates like the EU’s AML directives coming into force, compliance is now all about continuous, network-aware vigilance.
Teams must demonstrate they have the infrastructure to detect and respond to threats as they happen. So, how can organisations keep pace with risk that moves in real time?
Read More on Fintech : Global Fintech Interview With Justin Meretab, Co‑Founder and CEO of Layer
The shift from static to dynamic compliance
Legacy AML systems were built for a time when fraud was linear – when brute force attacks or high-volume card testing were the norm. But fraudsters now operate with synthetic identities that pass ID checks, AI-generated documents that mimic legitimacy and coordinated low-value transactions that slip beneath traditional thresholds and static checks.
These tactics are designed to evade detection by spreading risk signals across multiple accounts and interactions. Fraud networks often span borders and exploit shared infrastructure; the same devices, IPs, phone numbers and mule accounts are used across dozens of seemingly unrelated profiles. Yet many fraud and compliance functions still operate in silos, treating each case in isolation and missing the hidden threads that connect them.
This fragmented view is no longer viable in the era of AI fraud. In 2024 alone, the FCA took down over 1,600 unauthorised websites promoting financial services, many of which impersonated legitimate firms or exploited gaps in digital infrastructure to scam consumers at scale. For compliance teams, this creates a blind spot in the expanding digital threat landscape. Traditional tools weren’t built to connect external threats with internal risk, and yet, under UK regulations, firms are held accountable to do exactly that.
In sectors like iGaming, for instance, the consequences of these blind spots are already playing out. Fraudsters routinely deploy synthetic accounts to exploit bonuses or launder funds through coordinated betting and withdrawal patterns. While these accounts might appear legitimate in isolation, they often act in sync behind the scenes in ways that static systems rarely detect in time.
Regulators are responding with increasing urgency. Frameworks like the EU’s AML directives are pushing firms toward continuous monitoring and real-time, risk-based prevention. In the UK, the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act also introduces a new corporate offence for failing to prevent fraud, placing greater accountability on firms to detect and disrupt threats before they escalate.
But how do you spot fraud when every account looks clean on its own? How do you flag a synthetic identity that behaves like a model customer until it doesn’t? The answer lies in moving beyond isolated checks and toward a more connected, contextual understanding of risk. Because in today’s landscape, it’s not just about what a user does, it’s about who they’re connected to, and what those connections reveal.
Building a real-time risk framework
Understanding connections is one thing, but acting on them in real time is another. Traditional compliance systems may eventually surface suspicious activity, but by then, the damage is often done. Funds have moved. Accounts have vanished. And the opportunity to intervene has passed.
This is why compliance teams must turn to real-time risk scoring. Rather than relying on static thresholds or periodic reviews, it continuously recalculates risk based on evolving behavioural biometrics, digital footprint analysis and shared infrastructure. This AI-powered technology flags anomalies while interpreting the context. A user might appear legitimate on paper, but if they’re linked to a cluster of high-risk accounts or mimic the behavioural patterns of known fraud rings, their risk score adjusts instantly.
This shift allows for faster detection, fewer false positives and a more complete view of risk. It allows teams to spot synthetic identity rings logging in from the same device, or detect circular payments and clustered withdrawals that point to money laundering. By analysing how users relate to one another – not just what they do individually – compliance teams can prioritise genuine threats,reduce the noise that overwhelms traditional systems and mitigate friction. For instance, HSBC reported a 60% reduction in false positive cases after adopting AI-driven fraud detection, while dramatically improving the speed of investigations across billions of transactions.
To support this, many organisations are moving toward platforms that unify fraud and AML signals into a single, adaptive framework. Wider industry research increasingly points to the need for such integrated systems that provide the context and configurability needed to act on them with confidence. Crucially, they offer the flexibility to tailor rules by jurisdiction, customer segment or risk appetite, helping teams adapt to different markets and evolving threats.
This adaptability also extends to investigation and compliance reporting. Tools that offer transparent decision-making, explainable scoring logic and narrative-ready outputs help compliance teams justify actions to regulators and streamline the creation of suspicious activity reports. When fraud and compliance workflows are connected, teams gain deeper context and can act with greater speed and confidence. Real-time risk scoring doesn’t just help fight fraud — it helps firms demonstrate compliance with evolving regulatory mandates like the EU AMLDs and the UK’s new corporate offence.
Configurable compliance for a complex world
As financial crime grows more sophisticated – and increasingly AI-driven – so too must the systems designed to stop it. Static rules and siloed reviews no longer offer the protection or agility that modern compliance demands. What’s needed now is a more adaptive, connected approach and one that reflects the complexity of today’s digital ecosystems.
Real-time risk scoring is a critical part of that evolution. It allows fraud and compliance teams to move faster, understand more and act sooner; not just reacting to threats, but anticipating them. To stay ahead, organisations need systems capable of adapting to different jurisdictions, customer segments and risk profiles. The future of compliance is real-time, risk-aware and adaptable. The question now is whether your systems are built to keep up.
Catch more Fintech Insights : The CFO’s New Analyst: Using Generative AI for Strategic Financial Modeling
[To share your insights with us, please write to psen@itechseries.com ]
